<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash for Clunkers Program Might Be A Clunker Itself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-auto-government-industry-news/cash-for-clunkers-program-might-be-a-clunker-itself-94954/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-auto-government-industry-news/cash-for-clunkers-program-might-be-a-clunker-itself-94954/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Label Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-auto-government-industry-news/cash-for-clunkers-program-might-be-a-clunker-itself-94954/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Label Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoautoninja.com/?p=884#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is a pretty good post. keep them up and you&#039;ll have a subscriber for life :0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is a pretty good post. keep them up and you&#8217;ll have a subscriber for life :0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Membership</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-auto-government-industry-news/cash-for-clunkers-program-might-be-a-clunker-itself-94954/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Membership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoautoninja.com/?p=884#comment-371</guid>
		<description>First time checking out this blog, but I got to say I&#039;ll probably be here more often</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First time checking out this blog, but I got to say I&#8217;ll probably be here more often</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlashF</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-auto-government-industry-news/cash-for-clunkers-program-might-be-a-clunker-itself-94954/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoautoninja.com/?p=884#comment-345</guid>
		<description>I wish I could get a trade on my car. My 1956 Chevy Bel-Air is on its last legs and I could surely use a new Hyundai now...i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could get a trade on my car. My 1956 Chevy Bel-Air is on its last legs and I could surely use a new Hyundai now&#8230;i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: becky</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-auto-government-industry-news/cash-for-clunkers-program-might-be-a-clunker-itself-94954/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoautoninja.com/?p=884#comment-315</guid>
		<description>i so hardily agree. we have a 1983 toyota pickup, if we could afford a new car, we would have already bought one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i so hardily agree. we have a 1983 toyota pickup, if we could afford a new car, we would have already bought one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoautoninja.com/eco-auto-government-industry-news/cash-for-clunkers-program-might-be-a-clunker-itself-94954/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoautoninja.com/?p=884#comment-314</guid>
		<description>My 20 year old Camry does not qualify.  With 241,000 miles on it, it is a true clunker.  I was going to use about $1,500 from my tax refund to fix various minor things.  But, I heard about the possible clunker program and decided to wait.  I can afford a new car.  But why would I walk away from a well running car that has not had any trade-in value for several years?  Offer me $4,500 for it and I will buy a new car tomorrow.  The voucher, plus my repair set aside and dealer discounts would total to nearly 10K off the sticker price.  Question: How do you explain the miniscule increase in miles-per-gallon required for buying a new truck?  Answer: The bill is clearly intended to move unsold SUVs and trucks, which have large profits.  People in my position would likely buy another small car and drive it for 15+ years.  It appears that Congress is not interested in that.  So, I’m off to the repair shop to ensure that I get at least another couple of years off my clunker.  In 5 years my clunker transforms into a classic.  Honestly, I would have preferred to help the auto industry and help the environment by getting my fluid leaking, smoke emitting car off the road.  However, I won’t do it for free.  The bill is a great concept, but is a lousy plan... darn narrow-minded Congress.  I hope President Obama vetoes the bill.  Then he could sign a bill that was expanded to include all 15+ year old vehicles, with 175,000+ miles on them, which are worth less than the voucher value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 20 year old Camry does not qualify.  With 241,000 miles on it, it is a true clunker.  I was going to use about $1,500 from my tax refund to fix various minor things.  But, I heard about the possible clunker program and decided to wait.  I can afford a new car.  But why would I walk away from a well running car that has not had any trade-in value for several years?  Offer me $4,500 for it and I will buy a new car tomorrow.  The voucher, plus my repair set aside and dealer discounts would total to nearly 10K off the sticker price.  Question: How do you explain the miniscule increase in miles-per-gallon required for buying a new truck?  Answer: The bill is clearly intended to move unsold SUVs and trucks, which have large profits.  People in my position would likely buy another small car and drive it for 15+ years.  It appears that Congress is not interested in that.  So, I’m off to the repair shop to ensure that I get at least another couple of years off my clunker.  In 5 years my clunker transforms into a classic.  Honestly, I would have preferred to help the auto industry and help the environment by getting my fluid leaking, smoke emitting car off the road.  However, I won’t do it for free.  The bill is a great concept, but is a lousy plan&#8230; darn narrow-minded Congress.  I hope President Obama vetoes the bill.  Then he could sign a bill that was expanded to include all 15+ year old vehicles, with 175,000+ miles on them, which are worth less than the voucher value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

